\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Sports betting is immensely popular in England where television advertising has driven up betting revenues dramatically.\u00a0The best time and place to advertise has been found to be during a game; the increased interest generated by in-game television advertising is accommodated\u00a0<\/strong>by opportunities for in-game betting.\u00a0According to the media, never a friend of gambling, the advertising takes over the game and subjects children and gambling addicts to temptations.\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong>I have never seen it and must take them at their word; my closest experience was the Monday Football game on September 14, 2015, where FanDuel and DraftKings battled it out during every commercial break.\u00a0It certainly was overwhelming and there was no way to dodge or hide from the barrage. It brought a great deal of scrutiny on fantasy sports and those two companies.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n The professor\u2019s argument carried the day. However, the period of time when casinos were limited to those hard-to-get-to locations was short lived.\u00a0Each time another state legislature debated expanding gaming, it did so in search of tax revenues.\u00a0Those remote locations do not produce the same amount of tax revenue as casinos in major metropolitan areas.\u00a0Tax revenues from casinos in mountain towns are minuscule compared to cities and therefore the trend has been toward less restricted locations.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n Since 1990, gambling in some form has spread to nearly every corner of the country.<\/p>\n Although the United States has not reached the point of saturation of the British Isles, we are closer than one might think and we are getting closer every year.\u00a0Sports betting is the latest form of gambling to expand.\u00a0In May the U. S. Supreme Court struck down a 1992 federal law that banned commercial sports betting.\u00a0In the wake of that decision, six states have authorized gambling on sports and more are certain to follow. Currently, it is possible to place a wager on sports two ways, you can go to a casino or in some states sit down at your computer.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n Online gambling is also expanding, but it has received less attention than sports betting.\u00a0However, in time online gambling will produce much more revenue than sports betting and create greater risk of an English-like backlash.\u00a0New Jersey and Pennsylvania have authorized online gaming for both sports and casino gaming;<\/strong>Nevada, Pennsylvania, New Jersey and West Virginia presently only allow sports betting via the internet.\u00a0The lottery in seven states can be played online, but additional states are currently considering authorizing online lottery sales. Some states have confined their online-lottery thinking to sports betting, but others are considering video lottery terminals (VLTs) that could be played online. The real risk of a backlash similar to England lies with online Slot machines.\u00a0VLTs are slot machines and making them available through the internet puts them closer to the general population than even the FOBTs on the high street.\u00a0Slot machines may not be the cocaine of gambling as the British press has claimed, but they certainly are more addictive than table games or sports betting.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n Their addictive power lies in the speed or frequency of the outcomes.\u00a0A modern slot machine will give a player dozens of outcomes a minute.\u00a0By way of contrast, lotteries have drawings once or twice a week.\u00a0NFL football games are held only three times a week; even baseball and basketball with daily games only have outcomes once a day.\u00a0Gamblers on a roulette wheel, craps table or black jack table are lucky to get fifty decisions an hour.\u00a0It is much more difficult to become totally consumed in the act of gambling when it is necessary to wait for the results and the opportunity to make a new wager.\u00a0Slot machines have no wait time; as fast as the player can make the wager, the game will deliver a result and be ready to accept a new bet.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n The kind of threat that slot machines online present is getting closer with every legislative session.\u00a0When people can play slot machines at home, the narrative in England and the United States begin to intersect.\u00a0The pressure will result from the same two factors that caused the uproar and increased regulation in England.\u00a0Many more people will become addicted to gambling because many more will be exposed to it.\u00a0The spread of sports betting will also have a major social impact.\u00a0Sports are already central in American culture, watched and discussed constantly.\u00a0When gambling is attached to sports, it will be added to national dialogue, making conversations on gambling as common as talking about the scores.\u00a0Talking about gambling on sports will expose even more at risk people to gambling and thereby increase addictions.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n Whether the gaming industry can stop or control the expansion is a matter of debate.\u00a0But it could begin to consider seriously the social risks accompanying the dramatic growth of gaming in all its forms.\u00a0It could work to create mechanisms to protect at-risk people, before a crisis in public confidence occurs.\u00a0Using the English model, it can be assumed that a political backlash against all forms of legalized gambling will occur eventually.\u00a0The English government and gaming commission reacted to a media campaign.\u00a0Increased controls and restrictions on FOBTs and gaming television advertising were a direct result of the media pressure.\u00a0The gaming industry in England will survive, but it may be on a much smaller scale.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n A similar backlash could happen here, it would take much longer because there so many separate jurisdictions that would need to take action.\u00a0England is one jurisdiction and therefore changes are uniform and can happen very quickly.\u00a0National anti-gambling legislation is not impossible in the United States, but federal intervention is without precedent, Bobby Kennedy not excepted.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n It happened once before in the United States. In the 19th<\/sup>\u00a0century a backlash against corrupt lotteries led to laws outlawing lotteries and most other forms of gaming in the majority of the states.\u00a0It took a hundred years for legal commercial gambling to work its way back from the anti-gambling movement of the 19th<\/sup>\u00a0century. This risk is not worth taking.\u00a0A united effort by all of the stakeholders in gaming could develop some strategies and mechanisms for protecting at-risk gamblers and that would go a long way to stave off a disaster.\u00a0I think of it as a\u00a0<\/strong>preemptive action\u00a0<\/strong>to protect the gaming industry and the most vulnerable of the industry\u2019s customers.\u00a0Bookmakers and gaming operators in England are currently working to develop such strategies, but they are fighting a minor defensive fight, after the major battle of the war has already been lost.\u00a0The crisis has not yet arrived, but I believe this is the time to act before there is an overexposure to gambling here.<\/p>\n But that is just my opinion, isn\u2019t it?<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n